Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection for the treatment of stage II and III sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection is a novel technique. However, evidence in the literature regarding the advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RLS) is insufficient. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RLS versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer. We performed a retrospective study at the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital. Patients diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer and underwent anterior resection between January 2019 to September 2023 were included in the study. We compared the basic characteristics of the patients and the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients in the two groups. A total of 452 patients were included. Based on propensity score matching, 212 patients (RLS, n = 106; CLS, n = 106) were included. The baseline data in RLS group was comparable to that in CLS group. Compared with CLS group, RLS group exhibited less estimated blood loss (P = 0.015), more harvested lymph nodes (P = 0.005), longer operation time (P < 0.001) and higher total hospitalization costs (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in other perioperative or pathologic outcomes between the two groups. For 3-year prognosis, overall survival rates were 92.5% in the RLS group and 90.6% in the CLS group (HR 0.700, 95% CI 0.276-1.774, P = 0.452); disease-free survival rates were 91.5% in the RLS group and 87.7% in the CLS group (HR 0.613, 95% CI 0.262-1.435, P = 0.259). Compared with CLS, RLS for sigmoid colon cancer was found to be associated with a higher number of lymph nodes harvested, similar perioperative outcomes and long-term survival outcomes. High total hospitalization costs of RLS did not translate into better long-term oncology outcomes.

[A Case of Sigmoid Colon Cancer with Horseshoe Kidney].

We reported a case of sigmoid colon cancer with horseshoe kidney. A 79-year-old man had lower abdominal pain and underwent colonoscopy. The results of colonoscopy revealed sigmoid cancer. Preoperative computed tomography revealed horseshoe kidney. He underwent radical laparoscopic surgery. The histopathological diagnosis was pStage Ⅱa(The 9th Edition). He has not recurred 22 months later after operation. Surgery for colorectal cancer with congenital anomalies of the urinary tract requires attention to intraoperative secondary injuries. Therefore, preoperative evaluation using 3D-CT is useful tool for safety. Operating the proper dissecting normal layer would make safe laparoscopic operation possible without unexpected injuries.

Standardize the surgical technique and clarify the oncologic significance of robotic D3-D4 lymphadenectomy for upper rectum and sigmoid colon cancer with clinically more than N2 lymph node metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The territory of D3-D4 lymphadenectomy for upper rectal and sigmoid colon cancer varies, and its oncological efficacy is unclear. This prospective study aimed to standardize the surgical technique of robotic D3-D4 lymphadenectomy and clarify its oncologic significance. METHODS: Patients with upper rectal or sigmoid colon cancer with clinically suspected more than N2 lymph node metastasis were prospectively recruited to undergo standardized robotic D3-D4 lymphadenectomy. Immediately postsurgery, the retrieved lymph nodes were mapped to five N3-N4 nodal stations: the inferior mesenteric artery, para-aorta, inferior vena cava, infra-renal vein, and common iliac vessels. Patients were stratified according to their nodal metastasis status to compare their clinicopathological data and overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the relative prognostic significance of the five specific nodal stations. Surgical outcomes and functional recovery of the patients were assessed using the appropriate variables. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients who successfully completed the treatment protocol were assessed. The standardized D3-D4 lymph node dissection harvested sufficient lymph nodes (34.4±7.2) for a precise pathologic staging. Based on histopathological analysis, 28 patients were included in the N3-N4 nodal metastasis-negative group and 33, 34, and nine patients in the single-station, double-station, and triple-station nodal metastasis-positive groups, respectively. Survival analysis indicated no significant difference between the single-station nodal metastasis-positive and N3-N4 nodal metastasis-negative groups in the estimated 5-year survival rate [53.6% (95% CI: 0.3353-0.7000) vs. 71.18% (95% CI: 0.4863-0.8518), P=0.563], whereas patients with double-station or triple-station nodal metastatic disease had poor 5-year survival rates (24.76 and 22.22%), which were comparable to those of AJCC/UICC stage IV disease than those with single-station metastasis-positive disease. Univariate analysis showed that the metastatic status of the five nodal stations was comparable in predicting the overall survival; in contrast, multivariate analysis indicated that common iliac vessels and infra-renal vein were the only two statistically significant predictors (P<0.05) for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Using a robotic approach, D3-D4 lymph node dissection could be safely performed in a standardized manner to remove the relevant N3-N4 lymphatic basin en bloc, thereby providing significant survival benefits and precise pathological staging for patients. This study encourages further international prospective clinical trials to provide more solid evidence that would facilitate the optimization of surgery and revision of the current treatment guidelines for such a clinical conundrum.

Nationwide Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Sigmoid Colon Cancer-A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in advanced sigmoid colon carcinoma remains to be further characterized. Rationale for NAC includes downstaging on final pathology and optimization of microscopically negative margins (R0 resection). We investigated rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in advanced sigmoid colon cancer at academic cancer centers and assessed factors associated with likelihood of NAC administration. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2017 for patients with clinical T3 or T4, N0-2, M0 sigmoid colon cancer who underwent surgical resection. Those with neoadjuvant radiation or metastatic disease were excluded. The outcomes of patients who did and did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated for this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: There were 23,597 patients of whom 364 (1.5%) received NAC. More patients received NAC at academic (41%, P < .001) and high-volume centers (27%, P < .001). Patients with Medicare/Medicaid (39%) and private insurance (52%) were more likely to receive NAC (P < .001). There was a significantly higher rate of N2 to N1 downstaging in the NAC group. Propensity-score matching demonstrated comprehensive community cancer programs (CCCP) were less likely to provide NAC (OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.23, 0.70, P < .001). There was no difference in survival (P = .20), R0 resection (P = .090), or 30-day readmission rates (P = .30) in the NAC cohort compared to the non-NAC cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Access to centers offering multi-disciplinary care with NAC prior to surgical resection is important. This care was associated with academic and high-volume centers and private or government-sponsored insurance. There was no difference in survival between NAC and non-NAC cohort.

Long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Though our previous study has demonstrated that the single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 1) is safe and feasible for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer and has better short-term outcomes compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS), the long-term outcomes of SILS + 1 remains uncertain and are needed to evaluated by an RCT. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage T1-4aN0-2M0 rectosigmoid cancer were enrolled. The participants were randomly assigned to either SILS + 1 (n = 99) or CLS (n = 99). The 3-year DFS, 5-year OS, and recurrence patterns were analyzed. RESULTS: Between April 2014 and July 2016, 198 patients were randomly assigned to either the SILS + 1 group (n = 99) or CLS group (n = 99). The median follow-up in the SILS + 1 group was 64.0 months and in CLS group was 65.0 months. The 3-year DFS was 87.8% (95% CI, 81.6-94.8%) in SILS + 1 group and 86.9% (95% CI, 81.3-94.5%) in CLS group (hazard ratio: 1.09 (95% CI, 0.48-2.47; P = 0.84)). The 5-year OS was 86.7% (95% CI,79.6-93.8%) in the SILS + 1 group and 80.5% (95% CI,72.5-88.5%) in the CLS group (hazard ratio: 1.53 (95% CI, 0.74-3.18; P = 0.25)). There were no significant differences in the recurrence patterns between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in 3-year DFS and 5-year OS of patients with sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer treated with SILS + 1 vs. CLS. SILS + 1 is noninferior to CLS when performed by expert surgeons. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02117557 (registered on 21/04/2014).

Risk factors that impact long-term outcomes in sigmoid colon cancer with urinary bladder involvement.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the risk factors impacting long-term outcomes in patients diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer with urinary bladder involvement. METHODS: A comprehensive analysis was conducted on a retrospective cohort of 118 patients who underwent multivisceral resection for sigmoid colon cancer with urinary bladder involvement between June 2002 and May 2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify risk factors associated with long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Among the included patients, 10 (8.5%) experienced grade III-IV complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification, with 4 (3.4%) presenting anastomotic leaks. The postoperative mortality was 0.8%. R0 resection was achieved in 108 (91.6%) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administrated to only 31 patient (26.3%). Local recurrence was observed in 8 (6.8%) cases. Risk factors for local recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival were CCI>3, grade III-IV postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification, positive resection margins, stage III of the disease, additional resected organs (excluding colon and bladder) and the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. The same risk factors, with the exception of CCI, were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that negative resection margins, a postoperative period without grade III-IV complications, and the implementation of adjuvant chemotherapy are crucial factors contributing to improve overall, disease-free and local recurrence-free survival in patients with sigmoid colon cancer with urinary bladder involvement.

[Laparoscopic Low-Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer and Rectosigmoid Adenoma in a Patient with Situs Inversus].

A 63-year-old woman, who were in a nursing house, visited our hospital with complaints of bloody stools and anemia. Some investigations were performed, CS and CT revealed her diagnosis with sigmoid colon cancer(cT3N0M0)and rectosigmoid adenoma with situs inversus(SI). Laparoscopic low-anterior resection was performed. Postoperative course was good without any complications, and she discharged our hospital at the day 7 after the operation. In surgery, we had to be conscious of mirror image and set operative equipment and operative staffs inversely from normal setting. Some previous reports suggested that some surgical process such as cutting and separating with left hand(non-dominant hand), especially at interior separation, were effective in laparoscopic surgery for SI patients. However, in our operation, we used ultrasonic coagulator with short-pitched incision with surgeon's right hand(dominant hand)instead of left-handed process, and it could be useful for laparoscopic surgery for SI patients. In intrapelvic processes, we proceeded with the surgery as usual because of the symmetric structure of intrapelvic organs. We could complete the laparoscopic low-anterior resection for SI patient with several ingenuity for operative processes.

Comparison of Postoperative Outcome and Prognosis Among Laparoscopic Left Colectomy and Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy in Sigmoid Colon Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of laparoscopic left colectomy (LLC) and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LSD) on short-term outcomes and prognosis of sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) patients using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: In this retrospective study, the SCC patients who underwent LLC or LSD surgery were collected from a single clinical center from Jan 2011 to Dec 2019. Short-term outcomes and prognosis were compared between patients who received LSD surgery and LLC surgery. RESULTS: A total of 356 patients were included in this study. After 1:1 PSM analysis, there were 50 patients who underwent LLC surgery and 50 patients who underwent LSD surgery left in this study. No significant difference was found in baseline characteristics after PSM (P > .05). In comparison with the LLC surgery group, the LSD surgery group had shorter operation time (P = .003) after PSM. Moreover, the surgical procedure was not an independent predictor for overall survival (OS) (P = .918, 95% CI = .333-2.688) and disease-free survival DFS (P = .730, 95% CI = .335-2.150), but age (OS: P = .009, 95% CI = 1.010-1.075; DFS: P = .014, 95% CI = 1.007-1.061) and tumor stage (OS: P = .004, 95% CI = 1.302-3.844; DFS: P < .01, 95% CI = 1.572-4.171) were the independent risk factors for OS and DFS in SCC patients. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the two surgical procedures for prognosis of SCC patients. However, the possible reasons for changing the surgical procedures should be cautious by surgeons.

World's first report of sigmoidectomy for sigmoid cancer using the Saroa surgical system with tactile feedback.

Increasing evidence based on the safety and benefits of robot-assisted surgery indicates the disadvantage of the lack of tactile feedback. A lack of tactile feedback increases the risk of intraoperative complications, prolongs operative times, and delays the learning curve. A 40-year-old female patient presented to our hospital with a positive fecal occult blood test. A colonoscopy revealed type 2 advanced cancer of the sigmoid colon, and histological examination showed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a tumor in the sigmoid colon and several swollen lymph nodes in the colonic mesentery without distant metastases. The patient was diagnosed with cStage IIIb (cT3N1bM0) sigmoid cancer and underwent sigmoidectomy using the Saroa Surgical System, which was developed by RIVERFIELD, a venture company at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University, and the Tokyo Institute of Technology. Based on adequate simulation, surgery was safely performed with appropriate port placement and arm base-angle adjustment. The operating time was 176 min, with a console time of 116 min and 0 ml blood loss. The patient was discharged 6 days postoperatively without complications. The pathological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma, tub1, tub2, pT2N1bM0, and pStage IIIa. Herein, we report the world's first surgery for sigmoid cancer using the Saroa Surgical System with tactile feedback in which a safe and appropriate oncological surgery was performed.

Sigmoid take-off in rectosigmoid cancer as a landmark identifying benefit from neoadjuvant chemoradiation: A retrospective comparative cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There is no standard treatment strategy for rectosigmoid cancer because of the diverse definitions of the proximal rectal origin. This study aimed to evaluate sigmoid take-off compared with other landmarks of the rectosigmoid junction in guiding oncological therapy and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, comparative cohort study included patients diagnosed with rectosigmoid carcinoma at our centre between January 2010 and December 2018. The patients were classified into the neoadjuvant treatment group and upfront surgery group. The oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups in relation to the tumor position. RESULTS: A total of 656 patients (median age 64 years) were included. After propensity score matching, the 3- and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival in patients in both the groups were comparable. However, when only patients with rectal cancer as defined by the sigmoid take-off point were included, the disease-free survival rate in the upfront surgery group was significantly lower than that in the neoadjuvant treatment group (p = 0.03 in patients who underwent computed tomography, p = 0.03 in patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging). The turning point of the beneficial hazard ratio of neoadjuvant therapy was compared according to the different definitions of the rectosigmoid junction and the sigmoid take-off was found to be the most effective. CONCLUSION: The sigmoid take-off point is a suitable landmark for identifying the rectosigmoid junction and is an important defining criterion for assessing the benefit of neoadjuvant therapy. The application of this definition in clinical practice and future trials is warranted.

Infantile inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the sigmoid colon: a diagnostic dilemma.

An inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is an uncommon neoplasm composed of inflammatory cells and myofibroblasts in a fibrous stroma. They are mostly seen in the lungs and rarely involve the gastrointestinal tract. An 8-month-old infant presented with a history of lower abdominal lump for 2 months. Her CT scan confirmed a large, lobulated mass in the retroperitoneum arising from the pelvis. The mass was found to be arising from the sigmoid colon on laparotomy which was excised. Histopathology showed a cellular tumour composed of spindle cells and inflammatory lymphocytic infiltrate. Immunohistochemistry revealed positive staining for anaplastic lymphoma kinase and smooth muscle actin, confirming the diagnosis of IMT. The patient is doing well at her 6-month follow-up. Ours is the youngest case of sigmoid IMT among the only other series of eight cases reported in the literature indicating its rarity.

Sintilimab-induced erythema multiforme drug eruption in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Dermatologic toxicity has been reported as the most common immune-related side effect of programmed cell death 1 inhibitors. Previous reports related to Sintilimab include rash, pruritus, vitiligo, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and so on. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 66-year-old man was treated with Sintilimab as monotherapy for sigmoid colon cancer. After the second prescription, he developed a more severe and widespread rash. DIAGNOSES: The diagnose of erythema multiforme drug eruption induced by Sintilimab was considered. INTERVENTIONS: The patient received intravenous and oral methylprednisolone, routine antihistamines and topical gluccorticoids. OUTCOMES: The patient's symptoms were gradually relieved during hospitalization and was discharged following resolution of symptoms. He refused to continue using Sintilimab. LESSONS: This is the first reported case of Sintilimab-induced erythema multiforme drug eruption. It is advisable to inform patients of potential dermatologic toxicity that may occur after using immune checkpoint inhibitors, so that we may prevent the further development of it and avoid the discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors.